🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's win over the American player in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some letdown would have been understandable. Rather, he brought up the continued absence of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the world in succession. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's play in that very quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just say his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {